Legimus intellegam ea est, tamquam appellantur nec ei. Dicant perfecto deserunt quo id, ea etiam impetus pri. Mel ne vidit laboramus definiebas, quo esse aeterno
#FeedbackFriday – How would YOU re-write NCLB? – edu|FOCUS
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-386,single-format-standard,edgt-core-1.1.1,kolumn-ver-1.3.1,,edgtf-smooth-page-transitions,ajax,edgtf-theme-skin-dark,edgtf-blog-installed,edgtf-header-standard,edgtf-fixed-on-scroll,edgtf-default-mobile-header,edgtf-sticky-up-mobile-header,edgtf-animate-drop-down,edgtf-search-covers-header,edgtf-side-menu-slide-from-right,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.2,vc_responsive

#FeedbackFriday – How would YOU re-write NCLB?

To the dismay of many, Congress is currently re-writing No Child Left Behind, also known as NCLB. This is the federal law that governs Title 1 programs amongst other areas of federal education funding. So on this #FeedbackFriday we’re asking, if you were a member of congress, how would you re-write NCLB? What would you include or remove? Would you start over from scratch or just tweak the parts of the law you feel are not working. I’m particularly interested in comments from educators, who have been at odds with this law since the day President George W. Bush signed it into law in 2001.

In case you want to learn more about NCLB and it’s provisions, click here.

So tell me – if empowered to do so, how would you re-write NCLB? And don’t worry about lengthy answers, this topic deserves serious conversation.

Joanna Walls
  • Fuzziness
    Reply March 13, 2015 at 2:10 pm

    For starters I would get rid of standardized tests as a requirement. Kids are way too bogged down with stress because of those tests that don’t even tell you anything about how well your kid is learning.

  • Endre Walls
    Reply March 14, 2015 at 10:07 am

    I would start over from scratch, and change some of the philosophy behind the law. I’d remover the carrots that require states to abide by federally set goals simply because I think guidelines not standards will produce better and more innovative results.

    I would quadruple the funding, providing a set level (around $7,500) per student. States and municipalities would split the rest of the cost lowering property tax burdens and putting more people closer to the American Dream.

    I’d lose the idea of standardized tests the way they are today opting for a more sensible system of student assessments and professional evaluations for teachers that involve in-classroom evaluations and peer grading systems. Teachers cannot be evaluated from a test…and assessments for students have to give us more than a score against a median.

Post a Comment

Off The Shore Previous Post
International Women's Day Next Post

Follow us on Instagram